If it gets spread around Harry Potter If the TV series wasn't shaken enough already, the new delay looks set to cause even more trouble. The delay has triggered an obvious issue with the production of the reboot, and the producers will have to change their approach if they want to pull it off.
The HBO original series, which has exchanged hands from Max, is in development through 2021. The casting has been a major talking point of the show, as it will feature new faces playing already iconic characters in the movies. Fancasts and rumors have abounded since the first announcement, with some options receiving mixed-to-bad reactions online. But now, the Harry Potter TV serials have an entirely different casting problem at hand that requires an immediate rethinking of strategy.
related to
HBO should not give any Harry Potter story more than one season
HBO would be wise not to give any Harry Potter story more than one season for an upcoming TV show.
Further delay for Harry Potter TV series
HBO pushes release date to 2027
Not much confirmed information about Harry Potter TV series, except that it revives the original Hogwarts story and is planned to run for 10 consecutive years. It has not been revealed who will play the main trio of wizards – Harry, Ron and Hermione. But, like Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson in the film, the actors who played these roles will grow up alongside the characters in the series in real life.
But if the show follows typical TV production trends, it runs the risk of its child actors becoming a bit too grown up for their roles, especially as they reach their final seasons. Recent indications suggest that the show, which was earlier targeted for a 2026 launch, is now only expected to arrive by 2027. This was confirmed by Warner Bros. Discovery global streaming head JB Perrett at a press conference. Variety.
When you look at '26 and '27, you start a 10-year journey in the 'Harry Potter' series, which we're very excited about. And I would argue, that might be the biggest event until we get to that series.
Procrastination triggers aging problems for child actors
The new trio should look young enough
It has almost become standard for two seasons of a TV show to take at least two or three years of production between each other. When it comes to the child actors of this show, it can lead to aging problems. So, even with any delays, HBO must ensure that shooting schedules and release schedules are managed separately to avoid actors appearing too old for their roles, especially in consecutive seasons or episodes.
This is especially important since casting for these roles began earlier this year. Three years will have passed by the time the first season drops. Furthermore, casting directors will have to sift through 32,000 audition tapes from young actors competing for these three lead roles. Channing Dungey, president of Warner Bros. TV Group, also addressed this concern earlier.
The first step for us is to figure out who the showrunner is going to be and once we have that locked down, we can start making them happen. [casting] Conversations. The hardest part is the first two books, where the kids are on the younger side, about 11 or 12.
how Harry Potter It can solve the age problem
90s style TV production strategy
To solve this problem, the manufacturers Dr Harry Potter TV series should revisit some of the techniques used in 90s television production. Before, there was a new season almost every year, although each one had two or three times the number of episodes we get today. This strategy could allow HBO to release a solid full season every year while still managing to match the ages of the actors and characters well.
Back-to-back shooting seasons
This means that the planned seven or eight seasons have to be shot over just four to five years to ensure that the actors don't grow out of their roles. As a result, HBO will have to spend more, but this is a risk they must be willing to take to ensure quality. The reward that comes with this risk can also include better production value, as resources such as sets and costumes will be more concentrated for each table. This is essentially borrowing a page from Lord of the Rings The Product Playbook.
Shooting two-part movies or two seasons back-to-back is a tried and tested technique, therefore Harry Potter Nothing to worry about here. Marvel did this by shooting Eternal War and end game together with Upcoming too Squid game Seasons 2 and 3 are filmed back-to-back. In fact, the best example is within a franchise, eg Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 and Part 2 were actually shot together.
Can continuously improve product quality
The Harry Potter IP is too strong to fail
This approach saves logistical hassles, and is also an easy target Harry Potter to pull. It is not being adapted into a new IP film, and has references to previous outlines or models. Today, one of the reasons for the long gap between show seasons may be because the actors or showrunners are busy with other projects at the same time. However, considering the value of Harry Potter IP and the fact that child actors will be readily available, they should be able to film a season every year, if plans go well.
Manufacturers can also cope unfamiliar things situation, where the actors started out as literal children and are now fully grown adults by the time Season 5 comes out. Looking back to the original Harry Potter Movies, TV series can gain some confidence to handle this aging problem. The eight films were released over a 10-year period from 2001 to 2011, reflecting a 10-year plan from HBO for upcoming shows. So, as long as the new set of child actors follows a steady aging pattern at the visual level, Harry Potter A TV series reboot should be good to go.
Harry Potter
- Created by
- JK Rowling
- First movie
- Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
- The latest movie
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part Two
- Cast
- Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman, Michael Gambon, Ralph Fiennes, Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane
- where to look
- HBO Max