After the smash hit success of the first title, a sequel Hogwarts Legacy was inevitable. There's a very clear market for more adventures in the wizarding world, and Avalanche Software has its work cut out for it in creating a follow-up to one of the best-selling games in recent years.
But a major obstacle may stand in the way Hogwarts Legacy 2success of The first game was a whimsical journey through a full academic year at a prestigious school, and a big part of its charm was how accomplished the whole thing was. But with recent rumors that a sequel could embrace a live-service model, there could be a controversy that could hinder the sequel's ability to strike a similar chord.

related to
How Hogwarts Legacy 2 can split the difference between a sequel and a standalone game
Hogwarts Legacy 2 is officially in the works, but the second installment in the series could work between a sequel and a standalone game.
Hogwarts Legacy 2 Live-Service rumors could spell trouble for the future of the game
The live-action Hogwarts Legacy sequel may upset existing fans
WB's announcement about its renewed focus on live-service games could be a ticking time bomb. Hogwarts Legacy 2. The first game in the series was a very open and closed single-player experience. Fans were surprised that, even after the title's groundbreaking success, there was no additional story DLC waiting in the wings. thus, Hogwarts Legacy There was a lot of throwback to the old eras in gaming, which, combined with the Jab Harry Potter IP, probably fans' nostalgia increased many times.
Hogwarts Legacy remains one of WB's most successful efforts in recent memory. and with direct-service efforts MultiVersus and Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League Leaving a lot to be desired, it's not unreasonable to think that WB will try to parlay some of Hogwarts' success into a live-service model. And while that might sound like a smart business move on paper, fans aren't keen on it, as evidenced by a petition asking The WB to avoid live-service elements. Hogwarts Legacy 2.
The greatest appeal of Hogwarts Legacy It was immersion. From the moment a player starts the game for the first time until they receive the platinum trophy, they feel completely immersed in the wizarding world. A common concern of many fans is that adding live-service elements, especially multiplayer, will negatively affect the Hogwarts fantasy. While the concept of running around these iconic locations with friends seems like a slam dunk, it would be difficult to do in an online environment with hundreds of players; Probably impossible.
Finding a middle ground may be best for WB games
Regardless of the arguments, it seems that the majority of the community is not in favor of this change. Amid ongoing petitions and widespread online sentiment, many fans are firmly against the idea of a sequel adopting a direct-to-service model. If WB follows up with making another Hogwarts Some play along the lines of destiny or Suicide SquadThis can be a big point of friction within the community, and can even hurt Hogwarts Legacy 2is the overall sales. The best course of action would probably be something of a happy medium.
“Live service” doesn't necessarily mean multiplayer, it just means rolling out ongoing content for the game. That's exactly what the lot is Hogwarts Legacy Players wanted to add things like Quidditch, more spells, and more side missions to complete as DLC to the first game. It was never completed but the demand was still high. If WB plays it smart what kind of post-launch content it produces Hogwarts Legacy 2This avoids conflicts altogether.
While fans are concerned about the idea of live-service elements running into their immersive story-based series, there are strategic, non-intrusive ways this can be done. For example, cosmetic items can provide additional clothing, wands, and animal companions. The best thing WB could do would be a reasonably priced story DLC that gives fans those character interactions they love so much from the first game. Because the story and character were really ahead Hogwarts LegacyAnd if a sequel needs to lean into direct-serving content, it should ultimately be in service of the things that made the first game so beloved.