Key takeaways
- Erwin's calculated ruthlessness may have supported Eren's rambling plan as a strategic deterrent against Marley.
- Irwin's pragmatism and strategic mind may have led to a diplomatic solution rather than Irene's total destruction.
- Erwin's legacy as a leader suggests that he would support tempered rambling, using it as a preventative, not an apocalyptic, measure.
in Attack on TitanLeadership and morality are deep underlying themes in which the characters must make impossible choices for survival. Following Marley and his search for the outside world, the story tests the characters' resolve by questioning how far they will go to protect mankind. Although the method is different, leaders like Irene and Erwin pit ideals against each other. They share one aspect in common: to give up everything for an idea. Exploring what drives these characters reveals a series of personal and moral dilemmas in which they find themselves.
In the most interesting “what ifs”. Attack on Titan Must Have: If Irwin Smith had lived, he would have supported Eren's controversial rambling plan or not. His very calculated brutality was integral to many victories within the walls. The question is, does that practicality extend to cataclysmic moves like rambling? That's anyone's guess. Of course, speculation will drive Erwin's character, his motivations, and what kind of reaction he might have to the threat posed by Marley.
Attack on Titan: What if Eren and Armin joined forces against Marley?
Could Eren and Armin have achieved freedom without mass destruction?
Irwin's ideals and ruthlessness
A dream enlightened by his father's death
His journey began with the death of his father, who came up with the theory that beyond the walls was a place where humanity existed. This approach was rejected by both the society and the government. This instilled in Ervin a deep conviction to find out if it was true, even if it cost him his life. Unlike most people within the Wall, he knew that there might be life out there somewhere in this world, shaping his worldview to uncover mysteries hidden from the public eye. The mysterious circumstances of his father's death only strengthened his resolve to defy the odds and, in the end, prove his father right.
Because of this drive to find the truth he often found himself in gray moral areas. He is known for his sacrifices, and like Erwin, weighs the greater good against his personal ambitions at every turn. In Ervin's case, taking any risk was fair game, even if it cost putting his friends in harm's way. This animal ambition, transcending morality, would later draw a parallel to Eren's mentality against the Marlene threat.
Irwin and Eren's mentality
It is important to know that success requires sacrifice
Both Erwin and Eren convey a certain level of single-minded determination that makes them relentless in their pursuit of their respective visions. For Erwin, it was a matter of getting answers beyond the Wall, while for Eren, it was a matter of ensuring the safety and freedom of the Aldians at all costs. In furthering their agenda, each took morally complex actions to which they were accountable, seemingly extreme to others.
In many ways, Irwin's mindset parallels Irene's determination in the later arcs of the series. Erwin didn't do anything as drastic as mass murder, but many of his plans involved sacrifices that most people's moral codes would consider a no-go. Given Irwin's pragmatic nature, he may see rambling as the lesser of two evils, but how far he will go to condone it is anyone's guess.
Did Irwin support Rambling?
A leader's reckoning in the face of total war
If Erwin had lived to find out about Marley's involvement and suppression of the Aldians, he might have adopted a more strategic solution to this new threat. His curiosity was eventually quelled when Marley's existence was uncovered; Irwin's ambitions probably shifted towards protecting the Aldians without the need for total destruction. Instead of Rumbling, he had a chance to create some kind of diplomacy or other method, as he had a great ability to observe situations without being dispassionate.
At the same time, however, Erwin was a realist, and he knew that the Marleyans had harbored and passed on hatred against the Aldians for generations. As such, he may agree with Rumbling as a deterrent against further attacks, but not with Eren's proposed course of action to wipe out most of humanity. Therefore, Irwin probably presented a balancing argument, where Rumbling would be used more as an advantage rather than an actual plan.
Irwin's reaction to Irene's actions
Mentoring or confronting former comrades
Eren's actions in Rumbling, an extreme measure based on his desire to protect Paradise, may have elicited some sympathy from Erwin. He may have appreciated the utility of Irene's power to force Marley and the rest of the world to negotiate in his place. In contrast, as a strategist, he would certainly have been against the scale of Eren's plan and thus aligned with its controlled use for the purposes of balance rather than genocide.
If Irwin was deeply opposed to Irene's method, he could have tried to stop her by offering another solution, because we already know how desperate Irene was when she tried to coerce Hanji if she knew a better way, with what moral consequences and at what cost. they go Total destruction may have been brought to Paradise. Alternatively, he may have conversed with Eren, offering a vision of protecting the Aldians without destroying the entire world. Such instruction might have changed Eren's plans and softened the blow of the conflict.
How the results may change
Paradis and Eldia taking different paths.
Irwin had influenced Irene, in turn Attack on Titan It would be different. While Eren decided to go full-scale war, Erwin would advance the story in a conversational approach, appealing to the interests of both Paradise and the outside world. Perhaps with his strategic mind, Irwin could have solved the case at hand and saved Aldea without plunging the world into chaos, thus tracing a new path to peace.
Another example of this parallel universe would be that Paradise needs to coexist in a state of tension where neither Marley nor the world is completely destroyed. Under the leadership of Erwin, who would lead Paradis, there may be too much preparation for the defense to make a limited show of force to prevent their diplomatic stance from leaving room for further alliances or understandings.
Potential impact on rumbling plans
A leader torn between ideals and reality
Erwin's legacy as a calculated but idealistic leader speaks to Irene's approach to the Marleyan threat. While he shares Irene's willingness to do whatever is necessary, Erwin's strategic nature and quest for knowledge may have led him to such a disastrous solution. If Irwin had supported Eren, it would probably have been a tempered approval aimed at using Rumbling more as a deterrent than an apocalyptic endgame.
Erwin's question of fictionally participating in the ramblings is complicated: will his belief in realistic approaches make him willing to embrace the course of Irene's plan, or will his ideals push him toward a more balanced approach? One thing that fans can only speculate about, one thing is still clear: Erwin's presence left an indelible mark on the story. Attack on Titan And perhaps it led to a fate farther than it actually met.
Attack on Titan
- Release date
- April 7, 2013
- the creator
- Hajime Isayama
- MyAnimeList Score
- 8.55 (Season 1)